Ideological and Psychological Predictors of COVID-19-Related Collective Action, Opinions, and Health Compliance Across Three Nations

Authors

  • Becky L. Choma
    Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Gordon Hodson
    Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
  • David Sumantry
    Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Yaniv Hanoch
    Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Michaela Gummerum
    Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

Abstract

Until vaccines or treatments are widely available and used, behavioral change (e.g. social distancing) on an unparalleled collective scale is the chief way to curb the spread of COVID-19. Relying on ideology and collective action models as conceptual frameworks, in the present study the role of ideological and psychological factors in COVID-19-related opinions, health compliance behaviors, and collective action were examined in three countries. Results, examining country as a moderator, showed some politically conservative orientations, especially social dominance orientation, relate to less collective action, less support of measures to manage COVID-19, and lower compliance. Variables, including empathy for those affected by COVID-19 and group efficacy also predicted COVID-19-related attitudes and behavior. Belief in science and perceived risk also emerged as key factors to impact compliance-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications for motivating collective compliance are discussed.