Hope and Anger as Mediators Between Collective Action Frames and Participation in Collective Mobilization: The Case of 15-M

Authors

  • Anna Wlodarczyk
    Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile; Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behaviour Sciences, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain
  • Nekane Basabe
    Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behaviour Sciences, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria, Spain
  • Darío Páez
    Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behaviour Sciences, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain
  • Larraitz Zumeta
    Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behaviour Sciences, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain

Abstract

The study set out to integrate collective action models and emphasize the role of emotions. Whereas the importance of anger is indisputable, relatively little attention has been paid to the role of positive emotions, such as hope, in collective action research. Hence, the aim of the study was to explore the role of hope and anger as drivers of participation and involvement in collective mobilizations. A cross-sectional field study (N = 638) conducted right after the emergence of the 15-M socio-political protest movement in Spain assessed the emotions and beliefs of both demonstrators and those who took no part in the active mobilization. We hypothesized that anger and hope would sequentially mediate the relationship between collective action frames and participation in collective action. Furthermore, to test this premise, we ran two alternative sequential mediation models based on the social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) and the encapsulated model of social identity in collective action (EMSICA), but with emotions as mediators between collective action frames and intensity of participation. Both models fit the data well, suggesting the importance of considering multiple causal pathways, and showing that anger and hope sequentially mediate the relation between these frames and involvement in collective action. The results support the crucial role of hope in mobilizing individuals to take part in collective action.