Donald Trump as a Cultural Revolt Against Perceived Communication Restriction: Priming Political Correctness Norms Causes More Trump Support

Lucian Gideon Conway, Meredith A. Repke, Shannon C. Houck

Abstract


Donald Trump has consistently performed better politically than his negative polling indicators suggested he would. Although there is a tendency to think of Trump support as reflecting ideological conservatism, we argue that part of his support during the election came from a non-ideological source: The preponderant salience of norms restricting communication (Political Correctness – or PC – norms). This perspective suggests that these norms, while successfully reducing the amount of negative communication in the short term, may produce more support for negative communication in the long term. In this framework, support for Donald Trump was in part the result of over-exposure to PC norms. Consistent with this, on a sample of largely politically moderate Americans taken during the General Election in the Fall of 2016, we show that temporarily priming PC norms significantly increased support for Donald Trump (but not Hillary Clinton). We further show that chronic emotional reactance towards restrictive communication norms positively predicted support for Trump (but not Clinton), and that this effect remains significant even when controlling for political ideology. In total, this work provides evidence that norms that are designed to increase the overall amount of positive communication can actually backfire by increasing support for a politician who uses extremely negative language that explicitly violates the norm.

Keywords


Donald Trump; political correctness; communication norms; culture; backfiring

Full Text: PDF HTML
Downloads: 6899

https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i1.732

Array ( [0] => Array ( [FORWARD_LINK] => ) [1] => Array ( [JOURNAL_CITE] => [ISSN] => 2198-9885 [JOURNAL_TITLE] => Evolutionary Psychological Science [JOURNAL_ABBREVIATION] => Evolutionary Psychological Science [ARTICLE_TITLE] => How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm [CONTRIBUTORS] => [CONTRIBUTOR] => [GIVEN_NAME] => Array ( [0] => Noah Carl ) [VOLUME] => 4 [ISSUE] => 4 [FIRST_PAGE] => 399 [YEAR] => 2018 [PUBLICATION_TYPE] => full_text [DOI] => 10.1007/s40806-018-0152-x [FORWARD_LINK] => [BODY] => ) [2] => Array ( [JOURNAL_CITE] => [ISSN] => 1573-6725 [JOURNAL_TITLE] => Social Justice Research [JOURNAL_ABBREVIATION] => Soc Just Res [ARTICLE_TITLE] => Political Contamination of Social Psychology: A Review of Crawford and Jussim’s (2017) Edited Book on The Politics of Social Psychology [CONTRIBUTORS] => [CONTRIBUTOR] => [GIVEN_NAME] => Array ( [1] => Linus Chan [2] => James D. McFarland [3] => Lucian Gideon Conway ) [VOLUME] => 31 [ISSUE] => 3 [FIRST_PAGE] => 323 [YEAR] => 2018 [PUBLICATION_TYPE] => full_text [DOI] => 10.1007/s11211-018-0312-y [FORWARD_LINK] => [BODY] => ) [3] => Array ( [JOURNAL_CITE] => [ISSN] => 1948-5514 [JOURNAL_TITLE] => Social Psychological and Personality Science [JOURNAL_ABBREVIATION] => Social Psychological and Personality Science [ARTICLE_TITLE] => An Exploratory Investigation of Americans’ Expression of Gender Bias Before and After the 2016 Presidential Election [CONTRIBUTORS] => [CONTRIBUTOR] => [GIVEN_NAME] => Array ( [4] => Oriane A. M. Georgeac [5] => Aneeta Rattan [6] => Daniel A. Effron ) [FIRST_PAGE] => 194855061877662 [YEAR] => 2018 [PUBLICATION_TYPE] => full_text [DOI] => 10.1177/1948550618776624 [FORWARD_LINK] => [BODY] => ) [4] => Array ( [JOURNAL_CITE] => [ISSN] => 00926566 [JOURNAL_TITLE] => Journal of Research in Personality [JOURNAL_ABBREVIATION] => Journal of Research in Personality [ARTICLE_TITLE] => Personality and political preferences: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election [CONTRIBUTORS] => [CONTRIBUTOR] => [GIVEN_NAME] => Array ( [7] => Jo Ann A. Abe ) [VOLUME] => 77 [FIRST_PAGE] => 70 [YEAR] => 2018 [PUBLICATION_TYPE] => full_text [DOI] => 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.001 [FORWARD_LINK] => [BODY] => ) [5] => Array ( [JOURNAL_CITE] => [ISSN] => 0162895X [JOURNAL_TITLE] => Political Psychology [JOURNAL_ABBREVIATION] => Political Psychology [ARTICLE_TITLE] => Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left-Wing Authoritarianism in the United States [CONTRIBUTORS] => [CONTRIBUTOR] => [GIVEN_NAME] => Array ( [8] => Lucian Gideon Conway [9] => Shannon C. Houck [10] => Laura Janelle Gornick [11] => Meredith A. Repke ) [VOLUME] => 39 [ISSUE] => 5 [FIRST_PAGE] => 1049 [YEAR] => 2018 [PUBLICATION_TYPE] => full_text [DOI] => 10.1111/pops.12470 [FORWARD_LINK] => [BODY] => ) [6] => Array ( [JOURNAL_CITE] => [ISSN] => 01918869 [JOURNAL_TITLE] => Personality and Individual Differences [JOURNAL_ABBREVIATION] => Personality and Individual Differences [ARTICLE_TITLE] => Do right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism predict election outcomes?: Support for Obama and Trump across two United States presidential elections [CONTRIBUTORS] => [CONTRIBUTOR] => [GIVEN_NAME] => Array ( [12] => Lucian Gideon Conway [13] => James D. McFarland ) [VOLUME] => 138 [FIRST_PAGE] => 84 [YEAR] => 2019 [PUBLICATION_TYPE] => full_text [DOI] => 10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.033 [FORWARD_LINK] => [BODY] => ) [7] => Array ( [JOURNAL_CITE] => [ISSN] => 00219029 [JOURNAL_TITLE] => Journal of Applied Social Psychology [JOURNAL_ABBREVIATION] => J Appl Soc Psychol [ARTICLE_TITLE] => It’s security, stupid! Voters’ perceptions of immigrants as a security risk predicted support for Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election [CONTRIBUTORS] => [CONTRIBUTOR] => [GIVEN_NAME] => Array ( [14] => Joshua D. Wright [15] => Victoria M. Esses ) [VOLUME] => 49 [ISSUE] => 1 [FIRST_PAGE] => 36 [YEAR] => 2019 [PUBLICATION_TYPE] => full_text [DOI] => 10.1111/jasp.12563 [FORWARD_LINK] => [BODY] => [QUERY_RESULT] => [CROSSREF_RESULT] => ) )

Citations:

  • Noah Carl (2018)
    How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm
    Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4(4), p. 399(ff.)
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0152-x
  • Linus Chan, James D. McFarland, Lucian Gideon Conway (2018)
    Political Contamination of Social Psychology: A Review of Crawford and Jussim’s (2017) Edited Book on The Politics of Social Psychology
    Social Justice Research, 31(3), p. 323(ff.)
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-018-0312-y
  • Oriane A. M. Georgeac, Aneeta Rattan, Daniel A. Effron (2018)
    An Exploratory Investigation of Americans’ Expression of Gender Bias Before and After the 2016 Presidential Election
    Social Psychological and Personality Science
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618776624
  • Jo Ann A. Abe (2018)
    Personality and political preferences: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
    Journal of Research in Personality, 77, p. 70(ff.)
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.001
  • Lucian Gideon Conway, Shannon C. Houck, Laura Janelle Gornick, Meredith A. Repke (2018)
    Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left-Wing Authoritarianism in the United States
    Political Psychology, 39(5), p. 1049(ff.)
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12470
  • Lucian Gideon Conway, James D. McFarland (2019)
    Do right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism predict election outcomes?: Support for Obama and Trump across two United States presidential elections
    Personality and Individual Differences, 138, p. 84(ff.)
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.033
  • Joshua D. Wright, Victoria M. Esses (2019)
    It’s security, stupid! Voters’ perceptions of immigrants as a security risk predicted support for Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election
    Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(1), p. 36(ff.)
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12563



Creative Commons License
ISSN: 2195-3325
PsychOpen Logo