-
Katherine B. Starzyk
Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
-
Katelin H. S. Neufeld
Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
-
Renée M. El-Gabalawy
Departments of Clinical Health Psychology and Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
-
Gregory D. B. Boese
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Abstract
In three studies, we examined how racial/ethnic majority (i.e., White) and non-Indigenous minority participants in Canada responded to reparations for Indigenous peoples in Canada. Our goal was to understand whether and why there may be intraminority solidarity in this context. In Study 1, with a large, national survey (N = 1,947), we examined the extent to which participants agreed the government should be responsible for addressing human rights violations committed by previous governments as well as whether the government has done enough to address the wrongs committed against Indigenous peoples in Canada. With a sample of undergraduate students in Study 2 (N = 144) and another community sample in Study 3 (N = 233), we examined possible mediators of the relationship between ethnic status and support for reparations. Taken together, the results of three studies suggest that, compared to White majority Canadians, non-Indigenous minority Canadians were more supportive of providing reparations to Indigenous peoples through a complex chain of collective victimhood, inclusive victim consciousness, continued victim suffering, and solidarity.
