Science and the Public: Debate, Denial, and Skepticism

Stephan Lewandowsky, Michael E. Mann, Nicholas J. L. Brown, Harris Friedman

Abstract


When the scientific method yields discoveries that imperil people’s lifestyle or worldviews or impinge on corporate vested interests, the public and political response can be anything but favorable. Sometimes the response slides into overt denial of scientific facts, although this denial is often claimed to involve “skepticism”. We outline the distinction between true skepticism and denial with several case studies. We propose some guidelines to enable researchers to differentiate legitimate critical engagement from bad-faith harassment, and to enable members of the public to pursue their skeptical engagement and critique without such engagement being mistaken for harassment.

Keywords


rejection of science; public involvement in science; critical debate; transparency; harassment of scientists

Full Text: PDF HTML
Downloads: 6969

https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.604




Creative Commons License
ISSN: 2195-3325
PsychOpen Logo