Differential Effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Political Candidate Support: The Moderating Role of Message Framing

Jarret T. Crawford, Jennifer L. Brady, Jane M. Pilanski, Heather Erny


Employing a dual process motivational (DPM) model perspective, we found that how political messages are framed influences the differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) on political candidate support in the United States. Study 1 (N = 85) found that RWA and SDO differentially predicted support for right-wing candidates who used cohesion and group status threats to frame same-sex marriage, respectively. Study 2 (N = 89) largely replicated those findings on immigration policy. In Study 3 (N = 128), the hypothesis that RWA and SDO negatively predicted support for left-wing candidates who framed same-sex marriage in terms of individual liberty and social equality, respectively, received partial support. Additional analyses indicated that the effects of RWA on candidate support in these studies were driven by specific theoretically-relevant dimensions of RWA. Together, these results indicate that candidates can enhance their appeal by strategically employing value-based political messages targeting different subsets of their constituency.


framing effects; politics; candidate evaluation; right-wing authoritarianism; social dominance orientation

Full Text: PDF HTML
Downloads: 5124


Articles citing this article (data provided by Crossref)

  • Andrew S. Franks, Kyle C. Scherr (2015)
    Using Moral Foundations to Predict Voting Behavior: Regression Models from the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
    Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, p. n/a(ff.)
    doi: 10.1111/asap.12074

Creative Commons License
ISSN: 2195-3325
PsychOpen Logo