From the Editors

Editorial Report and Acknowledgement of Reviewers, 2025

J. Christopher Cohrs1, Johanna Ray Vollhardt2, Ana Figueiredo3, Idhamsyah Eka Putra4

Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2026, Vol. 14(1), 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.22751

Published (VoR): 2026-03-26.

Corresponding Author: J. Christopher Cohrs, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Psychology, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032 Marburg, Germany. Phone: +49 6421 2826632. E-mail: christopher.cohrs@uni-marburg.de

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Overview of the Journal in 2025

In 2025 we continued to work as a team of four co-Editors-in-chief and 22 Associate Editors, based in 17 different countries across the globe: Belgium, Chile, China, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Indonesia, the Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Portugal, South Africa, Switzerland, Turkey, the UK, and the U.S. Several of our Associate Editors are currently concluding their term, however. We thank Joaquín Bahamondes, Maria Fernandes-Jesus, Müjde Peker, Klaus Michael Reininger, and Inari Sakki for their years of service and contributions to the journal!

The journal published 22 articles in 2025: Issue No 1 of 2025 includes nine original research articles, one commentary, and our editorial report. It also includes a correction to a previously published article. Issue No 2 includes one commentary, and twelve original research articles. The published articles represent a range of different topics, research methods, and contexts: They include research on intra-minority solidarity, political and non-political goals among activists and non-activists, online dementia activism, decolonial approaches to feminist scholarship, structural inequality within academia, radical healing, polarization regarding Catalan independence, constructions of citizenship during nation formation, national nostalgia, identity claims of political leaders, socioeconomic status and right-wing voting intentions, threats and populist right-wing discourse, different subtypes of authoritarianism, right- and left-wing utopian thinking, conceptualizations of leftist ideology, social dominance orientation and political attitudes, differences between minority and majority groups in conspirational beliefs, human security, dangerous and competitive worldviews during the COVID pandemic, and lay theories about racial disparities during the pandemic. Research methods represented in the published articles in 2025 include surveys (including several representative surveys and longitudinal surveys) and other correlational studies, experiments, interview research, focus group interviews, (critical) discourse analysis and rhetorical psychology, thematic analysis, and various other qualitative methods. The contexts (countries in which samples were recruited or other data were from) represented in the articles published in 2025 include Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palestine and the Palestinian diaspora, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, the UK, and the US. Eleven additional manuscripts comprise our list of forthcoming articles (which authors can make available as author-accepted manuscript versions; see https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/aam).

Despite the relative diversity represented in the articles published in the Journal of Social and Political Psychology in 2025, which is a main aim of our journal, several continents and regions in the world continue to remain underrepresented in our journal. For example, European contexts are overrepresented and we only published one article each from South America and Africa, and two from Asia. We welcome and invite more submissions from these regions, and encourage authors to carefully consult our review criteria prior to submission, here: https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/peer-review.

Submission Numbers and Rejection Rate

In 2024, JSPP received 509 new submissions – a sharp increase compared to earlier years (278 in 2024, 244 in 2023, 271 in 2022, 290 in 2021, 235 in 2020, 186 in 2019, 148 in 2018, 101 in 2017, and 79 in 2016). The desk-rejection rate was at 81.34% (compared to 82.0% in 2024, 83.6% in 2023, and 60.9% in 2022). While we received more submissions from underrepresented countries, many were desk-rejected due to mismatches with our criteria, with submissions often being outside JSPP's focus and scope (see https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/peer-review). Notably, our review criteria deviate from more general journals in the subdiscipline, and include several aspects that are more specific to our journal with the aim of reserving journal space for manuscripts that include underrepresented methodological approaches, topics, and contexts in our field and encourage these submissions. To avoid delays and unnecessary labor for both editors and authors we urge authors to consult these criteria before submitting their manuscript to the journal. In light of the high number of unsuitable submissions (of which some may be AI-generated manuscripts), we are currently developing a systematic pre-screening system where authors will be asked to indicate how and where they engaged with the review criteria posted on our journal website to screen each manuscript before we assess it more closely.

In contrast to the high desk-rejection rate, the post-review rejection rate was merely 5.5% (in 2024: 3.2%). The average number of days to reject a manuscript was 23, which is another slight improvement compared to the previous year (where it was 26 days, compared to 50 days in 2023). The average number of days to accept (which can include multiple rounds of reviews and revisions) improved to 370 (compared to 468 in 2024 and 500 days in 2023).

We have noticed the rise of AI-generated tools being used in academic writing, which may partly explain the improvement in writing quality as well as the increase in the number of submissions. At JSPP, the use of AI is permitted for specific tasks (see “Use of Artificial Intelligence” here: https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/policies#author-policies). Beyond this, however, the use of AI for other academic purposes is not allowed, even if it is disclosed.

Publications, Citations, and Download Statistics

To date, JSPP has published (not including our editorial articles) 438 peer-reviewed articles (21 of which published in 2024). According to Google Scholar, these articles have been cited 16,062 times (as of March 3, 2026; see http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=knb2n1kAAAAJ).

The number of downloads of articles in JSPP has further increased, in fact almost doubled, from 282,402 downloads in 2024 to 555,424 in 2025. The top ten most frequently downloaded (as PDF) or viewed (as HTML or XML) articles (as of March 3, 2026) are listed in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 includes all articles that have been published so far in JSPP since its first issue; there are two new entries to the list compared to last year (Niemi et al., 2023, and Ochoa & Ong, 2022). Table 2 shows only those articles published in 2025. While the overall top ten comprises almost exclusively articles from Anglo-American based authors, with two exceptions, from Somaliland and the Philippines, the top ten of 2025 includes several articles from authors in various European countries as well as Hong Kong.

Table 1

Top Ten Most Frequently Downloaded Articles Published Between 2013 and 2025 (in Brackets Listed After the Authors Is the Country Location of the First Author at the Time of Publication)

Article title and authorsDownloadsPublication date
The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change (Happer & Philo, UK)198,275Dec 16, 2013
Social psychological perspectives on Trump supporters (Pettigrew, U.S.)43,878Mar 2, 2017
Decolonising Australian psychology: Discourses, strategies, and practice (Dudgeon & Walker, Australia)41,034Aug 21, 2015
Empathy and the liberal-conservative political divide in the U.S. (Morris, U.S.)39,143Feb 28, 2020
Political orientation and moral judgment of sexual misconduct (Niemi et al., U.S.)35,236Sep 14, 2023
Stages of colonialism in Africa: From occupation of land to occupation of being (Bulhan, Somaliland)24,882Aug 21, 2015
Objectification, self-objectification, and societal change (Zurbriggen, U.S.)18,139Dec 16, 2013
Recurrent fury: Conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial (Lewandowsky et al., UK & Australia)17,695Jul 8, 2015
Who coined the concept of ethnocentrism? A brief report (Bizumic, Australia)15,163Jan 31, 2014
Negotiated harms in moralized policies: The case of Duterte’s war on drugs (Ochoa & Ong, Philippines)14,160Oct 12, 2022
Table 2

Top Ten Most Frequently Downloaded Articles Published in 2025 (in Brackets Listed After the Authors Is the Country Location of the First Author at the Time of Publication)

Article title and authorsDownloadsPublication date
Effects of socioeconomic status on right-wing voting intentions: The mediating role of economic ideology, perceived threats, and national identity (Lois et al., Greece)8118May 14, 2025
Understanding committed leftists in the United States right before the 2020 U.S. Presidential election (Flores-Robles et al., U.S.)5952Feb 25, 2025
‘Way too white’: Navigating our colonial legacies through critical discussions on positionality and power dynamics with Palestinian feminist scholars (Cavazzoni et al., Italy)5285Feb 14, 2025
Systemic hierarchy within academic disciplines: How resource capital and social capital stratify academics and form the basis of disciplinary group-based inequality (Glasford & Brown, U.S.)4177Jun 17, 2025
Divided opinion: The interactional accomplishment of ideological antagonism (Balinhas & Tileaga, Ireland)2523Jun 25, 2025
Nostalgia for what and to what end? Multi-dimensional national nostalgia and its relationship with national identification and political preferences (Obradović & Baron, UK)2305Mar 26, 2025
One of us: Identity-claims and discursive strategies of Dutch party leaders in political speech (Lugtigheid et al., Netherlands)1448May 16, 2025
Utopianism and politics: Are there right-wing utopians? (Fernando et al., Australia)1204Mar 25, 2025
“Leftists”, a distinct and meaningful group? (Moreno-Montero, Spain)1098Sep 30, 2025
Cultural threats versus economic insecurities: A role-playing experiment on supporting populist radical discourses (Sudbrack & Beattie, Hong Kong)751Dec 19, 2025

Acknowledgment of Reviewers

Finally, we are grateful for the reliable and helpful support that we have received from the following 147 colleagues, who provided peer reviews for JSPP in 2025:

  1. Ghina Abi-Ghannam

  2. Amena Amer

  3. Rogger Holfre Anaya Rosales

  4. Yarden Ashur

  5. Antal Attila

  6. Zacharia Bady

  7. Peter Beattie

  8. Mikey Biddlestone

  9. Boris Bizumic

  10. Monique Borsenberger

  11. Chloe Bracegirdle

  12. Mark J. Brandt

  13. Manuel Cárdenas

  14. Vladimíra Čavojová

  15. Rosalie Chen

  16. Edward John Roy Clarke

  17. Sharon Coen

  18. Chaitali Das

  19. Raquel Diniz

  20. Sipho Dlamini

  21. Marcos Dono

  22. Roy Joseph Eidelson

  23. Michelle Fine

  24. Efraín García-Sánchez

  25. Sandra Geiger

  26. Nadya Gharaei

  27. Eliza Gheorghe

  28. David Giles

  29. Matthijs Gillissen

  30. Demis Glasford

  31. Cristina Gómez-Román

  32. Dmitry Grigoryev

  33. Nader Hakim

  34. Timo Häkli

  35. Devin Hanson

  36. Lea Hartwich

  37. Verlin Hinsz

  38. Laura Carlotta Hoenig

  39. Will Horne

  40. Alex Hunt

  41. Akira Igarashi

  42. Maria Ioannidou

  43. Anna Ivanova

  44. Alma Jeftić

  45. Hu Young Jeong

  46. Victor Hugo Jiménez-Benítez

  47. Yashpal Jogdand

  48. Arzu Karakulak

  49. Tijana Karić

  50. Fiona Kazarovytska

  51. Sanya Kenaphoom

  52. Laura Kilby

  53. Sanghoon Kim-Leffingwell

  54. Nino Kitoshvili

  55. Hroar Klempe

  56. Katharina Klug

  57. Larissa Knöchelmann

  58. Julia Kobrich

  59. Małgorzata Kossowska

  60. Patrick Kotzur

  61. Vladislav Krivoshchekov

  62. Kodai Kusano

  63. Barbara Lášticová

  64. Michel Lengieza

  65. Luisa Liekefett

  66. Trevor Lies

  67. Kieren Lilly

  68. Paulo Vítor Lisboa

  69. David Lishner

  70. Penny Litchfield

  71. Efisio Manunta

  72. Jari Martikainen

  73. Ali Mashuri

  74. Jason Miller

  75. Zuzanna Molenda

  76. Lehasa Moloi

  77. Fernando Moreno-Montero

  78. Davide Morselli

  79. Carla Mouro

  80. Tomoya Mukai

  81. Vhuwhavho Nekhavhambe

  82. Dennis Nigbur

  83. Milica Ninkovic

  84. Nkululeko Nkomo

  85. Evangelos Ntontis

  86. Branagh O' Shaughnessy

  87. Emma O'Dwyer

  88. Mukadder Okuyan

  89. Torjer Olsen

  90. Danny Osborne

  91. Stefano Passini

  92. Beatriz Pereira

  93. Davin Lanier Phoenix

  94. Joseph Pierre

  95. José Q. Pinheiro

  96. Emanuele Politi

  97. Vladimir Ponizovskiy

  98. Lenin Raghuvanshi

  99. Brian Rathbun

  100. Angela Robinson

  101. Lena Rollicke

  102. Miriam Rosa

  103. Carmen Sanchez

  104. Elif Sandal Önal

  105. Antonis Sapountzis

  106. Mauro Sarrica

  107. Julia Sasse

  108. Özge Savas

  109. Julia Schnepf

  110. Colin Scott

  111. Marc Scully

  112. Shruti Sharma

  113. David Sherman

  114. Roomana N. Siddiqui

  115. Julia Simango

  116. Mónica Catarina Soares

  117. Irina Soboleva

  118. Jakub Šrol

  119. Markus Steinbrecher

  120. Stephanie Szeto

  121. Selin Tekin Guven

  122. Ali Teymoori

  123. Giovanni Travaglino

  124. Wandile Tsabedze

  125. Yasemin Ulusahin

  126. Joshua Uyheng

  127. Mete Sefa Uysal

  128. Daan Vandermeulen

  129. Ana Vergara Del Solar

  130. Denise Vesper

  131. Sara Vestergren

  132. Shpend Voca

  133. Maitland Waddell

  134. Joseph Anthony Wagoner

  135. Daniel Walsh

  136. Zhechen Wang

  137. Shaun Wiley

  138. Cynthia Willis-Esqueda

  139. Johanna Woitzel

  140. David Yamane

  141. Lisette Yip

  142. Magi Young

  143. Sarah Zahreddine

  144. Yara Zebian

  145. Iris Zezelj

  146. Jiqi Zhang

  147. Anna Zlobina

Funding

The authors have no funding to report.

Acknowledgments

As always, we reiterate our sincere thanks go to the whole PsychOpen team – most notably Judith Tinnes, Gerrit Fröhlich, and Tina Keil – for their consistent and valuable support of the journal throughout the year.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.