The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

Alternatively, you can also download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link below.

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Download this PDF file Fullscreen Fullscreen Off

Articles citing this article (data provided by Crossref)

  • Beate Seibt, Thomas W. Schubert, Janis H. Zickfeld, Alan P. Fiske (2018)
    Touching the base: heart-warming ads from the 2016 U.S. election moved viewers to partisan tears
    Cognition and Emotion, p. 1(ff.)
    doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1441128
  • Christine Ma-Kellams, Brianna Bishop, Mei Fong Zhang, Brian Villagrana (2017)
    Using “Big Data” Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election
    Psychological Reports, p. 003329411773631(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/0033294117736318
  • Ryne A. Sherman (2018)
    Personal values and support for Donald Trump during the 2016 US presidential primary
    Personality and Individual Differences, 128, p. 33(ff.)
    doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.020
  • Robert Y. Shapiro (2017)
    What We Relearned and Learned from the 2016 Elections: Comment on Gelman and Azari
    Statistics and Public Policy, 4(1), p. 1(ff.)
    doi: 10.1080/2330443X.2017.1399842
  • Marta Marchlewska, Aleksandra Cichocka, Orestis Panayiotou, Kevin Castellanos, Jude Batayneh (2018)
    Populism as Identity Politics
    Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), p. 151(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/1948550617732393
  • David Norman Smith, Eric Hanley (2018)
    The Anger Games: Who Voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 Election, and Why?
    Critical Sociology, 44(2), p. 195(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/0896920517740615
  • Lanier Frush Holt (2018)
    Using the Elaboration Likelihood Model to Explain to Whom “#Black Lives Matter” … And to Whom it Does Not
    Journalism Practice, 12(2), p. 146(ff.)
    doi: 10.1080/17512786.2017.1370974
  • Christopher D. Petsko, Galen V. Bodenhausen (2017)
    Race–Crime Congruency Effects Revisited
    Social Psychological and Personality Science, p. 194855061773611(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/1948550617736111
  • James Spickard (2017)
    Diversity vs. Pluralism: Reflections on the Current Situation in the United States
    Religions, 8(9), p. 169(ff.)
    doi: 10.3390/rel8090169
  • Oliver Hahl, Minjae Kim, Ezra W. Zuckerman Sivan (2018)
    The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue: Proclaiming the Deeper Truth about Political Illegitimacy
    American Sociological Review, 83(1), p. 1(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/0003122417749632
  • Eric D. Knowles, Linda R. Tropp (2018)
    The Racial and Economic Context of Trump Support
    Social Psychological and Personality Science, p. 194855061875932(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/1948550618759326
  • Martin Obschonka, Michael Stuetzer, Peter J. Rentfrow, Neil Lee, Jeff Potter, Samuel D. Gosling (2018)
    Fear, Populism, and the Geopolitical Landscape
    Social Psychological and Personality Science, p. 194855061875587(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/1948550618755874
  • Martin Obschonka, Christian Fisch (2018)
    Entrepreneurial personalities in political leadership
    Small Business Economics, 50(4), p. 851(ff.)
    doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9901-7
  • Yaqin Wang, Haitao Liu (2017)
    Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? An analysis of stylistic features of Donald Trump’s political discourse during the 2016 election
    Discourse & Society, p. 095792651773465(ff.)
    doi: 10.1177/0957926517734659

Creative Commons License
ISSN: 2195-3325
PsychOpen Logo